Therapeutic Aspects of the Human-Companion Animal 
Interaction

by Sandra B. Barker, Ph.D. 
Psychiatric Times February 1999 Vol. XVI Issue 2

Although the majority of American households includes a pet, 
it is only recently that we have begun to explore the 
relationship between people and their pets and the possible 
physical and emotional benefits of that relationship. Early 
surveys reported a strong psychological and emotional 
attachment between people and their pets, and the term 
human-animal bond emerged to represent this attachment. 
Studies revealed that most pet owners view their pets as 
both enhancing the quality of family life by minimizing 
tension between family members and enhancing their owner's 
compassion for living things (Barker, 1993; Pet Theories, 
1984; Voith, 1985). Using a projective technique to 
investigate owners' closeness to their pet dogs, Barker and 
Barker (1988, 1990) found that dog owners were as 
emotionally close to their dogs as to their closest family 
member. They reported that more than one-third of the dog 
owners in their study were actually closer to their dogs 
than to any human family member. 
Benefits of Pet Ownership
With documentation of the strong human-companion animal bond 
came studies of how pet ownership may affect physical and 
mental health. Friedmann et al. (1980) conducted one of the 
first such studies, which compared the survival rates of pet 
owners and non-pet owners following a myocardial infarction 
(MI). Controlling for exercise, the investigators found a 
significantly higher survival rate, one year post-MI, for 
pet owners. Other studies supporting a cardiovascular 
benefit associated with pet ownership followed; they are 
summarized by Patronek and Glickman (1993). Perhaps the 
largest cardiovascular study of pet owners conducted to date 
involved over 5,700 participants taking part in a 
cardiovascular screening program in Australia (Anderson et 
al., 1992). The results showed that male pet owners had 
significantly lower systolic blood pressure, and 
triglyceride and cholesterol levels than males who did not 
own pets. The study also showed that, of females over the 
age of 40, those who owned pets had lower systolic blood 
pressure and triglyceride levels than those who did not. 
Other researchers have examined the relationship between pet 
ownership and more general health factors. Serpell (1991) 
compared adults before and after they acquired a pet, and 
found a decrease in minor health problems for pet owners. 
Examining reported health and morale in older adults living 
in the community, Lago et al. (1989) found pet ownership and 
attitudes toward pets to be significant predictors of these 
variables. Siegel (1990) compared physician utilization of 
Medicare recipients experiencing stressful life events and 
found lower utilization among pet owners compared to those 
who did not own pets. Allen et al. (1991) reported that 
females had lowered stress levels when their dogs were 
present compared with the presence of a human best friend or 
control condition. 
Professionals working with children have also written about 
the benefits of pet ownership. Erikson's (1963) stages of 
psychosocial development provide a useful framework for 
considering potential benefits. Pets may contribute to the 
development of 1) a child's basic sense of trust through the 
pet's constancy, security, reliability, love and affection, 
and ability to serve as a transitional object; 2) a sense of 
autonomy and initiative through the pet's serving as an 
active playmate and promoting exploration of the 
environment, and encouraging patience and self-control; 3) a 
sense of industry through the pet's trainability and 
response to the child's basic commands; and 4) a sense of 
identity through the pet's serving as a companion and 
confidant, and providing social and emotional support (Blue, 
1986; Brown et al., 1996; Bryant, 1990; Robin and ten 
Bensel, 1990). Others have focused on specific qualities 
that may be enhanced in children growing up in pet-owning 
households. Some researchers have found that children with 
pets score higher on measures of empathy, self-esteem and 
self-concept than those who do not. (Poresky and Hendrix, 
1990; Van Houtte and Jarvis, 1995). 
Focusing on a clinical population, Barker et al. (1997) 
showed the strong supportive role of pets in the childhood 
of sexual abuse survivors. In this retrospective study, they 
found that, in some cases, the pet was the only reported 
supportive entity in the survivor's childhood. In sexual 
abuse survivors, Nebbe (1998) reports that survivors with a 
strong human-animal bond in childhood report less abusive 
behavior as adults, and lower anger levels than those 
lacking a strong bond.
Other researchers have investigated the effects of 
introducing previously unknown companion animals into health 
care settings. These activities have ranged from simple 
visitation by a pet and its owner, to the purposeful 
inclusion of animals in patient treatment. This 
animal-assisted therapy has been shown to facilitate the 
achievement of therapeutic goals.
Animal Visitation
Studies have found that simply having an animal present or 
visiting is beneficial to children and adults in some health 
care situations. Friedmann et al. (1983) observed reductions 
in children's blood pressure levels when a dog was present 
during a mildly stressful task. More recently, Wells (1998) 
found that the presence of a dog during potentially painful 
medical procedures reduced chronically ill children's 
physiological and psychological levels of distress. 
Similarly, Nagengast et al. (1993) found children's levels 
of distress during physical examinations were lower when a 
companion animal was present in the room. 
Such findings have also been reported for adults. Katcher et 
al. (1984) reported reduced blood pressure levels for adults 
watching an aquarium. Others have addressed the positive 
influence of animals in acute care settings, nursing homes 
and rehabilitation settings, as well as in psychiatric 
settings (Barba, 1995; Brickel, 1980; Voelker, 1995). In 
nursing homes, residents have been found to be less 
depressed following animal visits (Francis et al., 1985). 
Patients hospitalized on a psychiatric service have been 
found to have better group attendance and fewer psychiatric 
symptoms when caged birds are present (Beck et al., 1986), 
and increased positive socialization has been found for 
Alzheimer's patients when a dog was present (Batson et al., 
1995).
Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) 
While receiving heightened media attention in recent years, 
AAT can be traced back to at least the 18th century when 
hippotherapy, or therapeutic horseback riding, was used as a 
medical intervention for improving postural control, joint 
disturbance, coordination and basic balance (Depauw, 1983). 
In addition to these physical benefits, hippotherapy has 
also been noted to improve feelings of self-worth and power 
as patients are freed from the mechanical supports of 
wheelchairs and crutches, and are able to move about on a 
powerful animal (Blue, 1986). Today, horses are also used in 
psychotherapy to assist patients in improving ego strength, 
self-confidence and social competence (Schneidhacker, 1994).
An early report of the potential of AAT in mental health 
care was provided by Boris Levinson, M.D., a Canadian child 
psychiatrist who included his dog in therapy sessions 
(1962). Based on his observations of the interaction between 
his child patients and the dog during therapy sessions, he 
reported that the dog served as a communication link, 
provided the child with a sense of security in the therapy 
setting and quickened the therapy process. Levinson found 
that AAT worked well with children who were nonverbal, 
inhibited, autistic, schizophrenic, withdrawn, 
obsessive-compulsive or culturally disadvantaged. He found 
the dog particularly beneficial in helping to strengthen 
autistic children's contact with reality. A more recent and 
controlled study of autistic children and AAT reported 
increased social response by children to both animal and 
therapist (Campbell and Katcher, 1992). 
An AAT/nature education program was found to be therapeutic 
for children in residential treatment for 
attention-deficit/hyperactive and conduct disorders (Katcher 
and Wilkins, 1994). The results of this controlled study 
indicated the AAT program was effective in decreasing 
agitated and aggressive behavior, improving cooperation with 
instructors, engaging students in learning, and in improving 
behavioral control in regular classrooms. 
Others have also addressed the potential therapeutic role of 
companion animals with other psychiatric populations such as 
those with dissociative disorders, Alzheimer's disease, 
dementia and other chronic mental illnesses (Arnold, 1995; 
Corson and Corson, 1978; Fritz et al., 1995; Hundley, 1991). 
The role of companion animals in psychotherapy, and their 
ability to serve as a clinical bridge, has also been 
described by Barker et al. (1997), Draper et al. (1990) and 
Mallon (1992). Based on clinical observations, such authors 
assert the ability of companion animals to demonstrate 
acceptance by allowing themselves to be petted, to reduce 
the threat of the therapy setting by their presence, and to 
serve as a distraction while patients discuss painful 
material.
A recent study documented the anxiolytic effect of 
animal-assisted therapy with hospitalized psychiatry 
patients (Barker and Dawson, 1998). Using a controlled, 
cross-over design, the researchers compared patients' 
anxiety levels following AAT and following traditional 
therapeutic recreation (TR) activities. Results revealed 
significant reductions in anxiety following AAT for patients 
with mood disorders, psychotic disorders and other 
disorders. For the comparison group, only patients with mood 
disorders showed significant reductions in anxiety. 
Interestingly, the reduction in anxiety levels for the 
psychotic patients following AAT was twice as great as that 
found following TR. The researchers speculate that AAT may 
be less threatening than traditional group activities, that 
the physical contact such as hugging and petting the dog may 
result in the same physiological and psychological 
reductions in stress that have been reported for nonclinical 
populations, and that the dog may serve as an entertaining 
distraction.
Although the majority of published studies of AAT involve 
dogs, other species have been noted to have beneficial 
effects as well. Several studies have noted the positive 
effect for mentally challenged children interacting with 
marine animals. Benefits of interacting with rehabilitated 
dolphins, sea turtles and fish were reported by Klingel 
(1993) to include progress toward, and attainment of, 
treatment goals and improved self-concept, as well as 
enjoyable recreational experiences. Nathanson and de Faria 
(1991) studied the orienting nonverbal and verbal responses 
of children with mental disabilities interacting in water 
with dolphins or in water with favorite toys away from 
dolphins. They report more significant improvements in 
hierarchical cognitive responses when children interacted 
with the dolphin. They also note the dolphin interaction 
produced both a greater number and higher level of responses 
than the interactions without the dolphins. 
Summary
As with any new field of inquiry, initial reports of the 
benefits of interacting with companion animals were 
primarily anecdotal or case reports. Based on such reports, 
studies of efficacy that often involved small sample sizes 
and a lack of controls were undertaken. As evidence has 
continued to accumulate, more rigorous controlled studies 
are being conducted, resulting in the emergence of a 
significant body of literature supporting the therapeutic 
value of the human-companion animal interaction in specific 
circumstances. However, more research is needed-particularly 
well-designed outcome studies of AAT programs and 
longitudinal studies of pet ownership-in order to increase 
our understanding of the human-companion animal interaction 
and the potential benefits to quality of life.
Dr. Barker is an associate professor of psychiatry, internal 
medicine, and anesthesiology at the Medical College of 
Virginia at Virginia Commonwealth University and an adjunct 
professor of small animal clinical sciences at 
Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine. 
She has published numerous papers on the human-companion 
animal interaction.
References
Allen KM, Blascovitch J, Tomaka J, Kelsey RM (1991), 
Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of 
autonomic responses to stress in women. J Pers Soc Psychol 
61(4):582-589.
Anderson WP, Reid CM, Jennings GL (1992), Pet ownership and 
risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Med J Aust 
157(5):298-301.
Arnold JC (1995), Therapy dogs and the dissociative patient: 
Preliminary observations. Dissociation 8(4):247-252.
Barba BE (1995), The positive influence of animals: 
Animal-assisted therapy in acute care. Clin Nurs Spec 
9(4):199-202. See comments.
Barker SB (1993), Pet owners no longer grieve alone. Am 
Counselor 2(4):26-31.
Barker SB, Barker, RT (1990), Investigation of the construct 
validity of the Family Life Space Diagram. J Ment Health 
Counseling 12:506-514.
Barker SB, Barker RT (1988), The human-canine bond: Closer 
than family ties? J Ment Health Counseling 10:46-56.
Barker SB, Dawson KS (1998), The effects of animal-assisted 
therapy on anxiety ratings of hospitalized psychiatric 
patients. Psychiatr Serv 49 (6):797-801.
Barker SB, Barker RT, Dawson KS, Knisely JS (1997), The use 
of the family life space diagram in establishing 
interconnectedness: a preliminary study of sexual abuse 
survivors, their significant others and pets. Individual 
Psychol 53(4):435-450.
Batson K, McCabe BW, Baun MM et al. (1995), The effect of a 
therapy dog on socialization and physiologic indicators of 
stress in persons diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. 
Animals, Health and Quality of Life: Abstract Book. Paris, 
France: AFIRAC.
Beck A, Seraydarian L, Hunter GF (1986), The use of animals 
in the rehabilitation of psychiatric inpatients. Psychol Rep 
58(1):63-66.
Blue GF (1986), The value of pets in children's lives. 
Childhood Education 24:85-89.
Brickel CM (1980), A review of the roles of pet animals in 
psychotherapy and with the elderly. Int J Aging Hum Dev 
12(2):119-128.
Brown BH, Richards HC, Wilson CA (1996), Pet bonding and pet 
bereavement among adolescents. J Counseling and Development 
74:505-509.
Bryant BK (1990), The richness of the child-pet 
relationship: a consideration of both benefits and costs of 
pets to children. Anthrozoцs 3:253-261. 
Campbell C, Katcher A (1992) Animal assisted therapy dogs 
for autistic children: Quantitative and qualitative results. 
Presented at the Sixth International Conference on 
Human-Animal Interactions. Montreal.
Corson SA, Corson EO (1978), Pets as mediators of therapy. 
Curr Psychiatr Ther 18:195-205.
DePauw K (1984), Therapeutic horseback riding in Europe and 
America. In: The Pet Connection: Its Influence on Our Health 
and Daily Life, Anderson RK, Hart BL, Hart LA eds. 
Minneapolis: Center to Study Human-Animal Relationships and 
Environments, pp 141-153.
Draper RJ, Gerber GJ, Layng EM (1990), Defining the role of 
pet animals in psychotherapy. Psychiatr J Univ Ott 
15(3):169-172.
Erikson EH (1964), Childhood and Society. New York: Norton.
Francis G, Turner JT, Johnson SB (1985), Domestic animal 
visitation as therapy with adult home residents. Int J Nurs 
Stud 22(3):201-206.
Friedmann E, Katcher AH, Lynch JJ, Thomas SA (1980), Animal 
companions and one-year survival of patients after discharge 
from a coronary care unit. Public Health Rep 95(4):307-312.
Friedmann E, Katcher AH, Thomas SA et al. (1983), Social 
interaction and blood pressure: Influence of companion 
animals. J Nerv Ment Dis 171(8):461-465.
Fritz CL, Farver TB, Kass PH, Hart LA (1995), Association 
with companion animals and the expression of noncognitive 
symptoms in Alzheimer's patients. J Nerv Ment Dis 
183:459-463.
Hundley J (1991), Pet Project: The use of pet facilitated 
therapy among the chronically mentally ill. J Psychosoc Nurs 
Ment Health Serv 29(6):23-26.
Katcher AH, Segal H, Beck A (1984), Contemplation of an 
aquarium for the reduction of anxiety. In: The Pet 
Connection, Anderson RK, Hart B, Bart L, eds. Minneapolis: 
The Center For the Interaction of Animals and Society, pp 
171-178.
Katcher AH, Wilkins GG (1994), The use of animal assisted 
therapy and education with attention-deficit hyperactive and 
conduct disorders. Interactions 12(4):1-5.
Klingel M (1991), Dolphincare: A therapeutic recreation 
program for emotionally disturbed adolescents. Presented at 
the Tenth Annual Delta Society Conference. Portland, Ore.
Lago D, Delaney M, Miller M et al. (1989), Companion 
animals, attitudes towards pets, and health outcomes among 
the elderly: a long-term follow-up. Anthrozoцs 3:25-34.
Levinson BM (1962), The dog as co-therapist. Ment Hyg 
46:59-65. 
Mallon GP (1992), Utilization of animals as therapeutic 
adjuncts with children and youth: a review of the 
literature. Child and Youth Care Forum 21:53-67.
Nagengast SL, Baun MM, Leibowitz MJ, Megel M (1993), The 
effects of the presence of a companion animal on 
physiological and behavioral distress in children during a 
physical examination. Presented at the Delta Society 12th 
Annual Conference on the Interactions of people and Animals. 
St. Louis.
Nathanson DE, de Faria S (1993), Cognitive improvement of 
children in water with and without dolphins. Anthrozoцs 
6(1):17-29.
Nebbe L (1998), The Human-Animal Bond's Role with the Abused 
Child. Presented at the Delta Society 17th Annual 
Conference. Seattle.
Patronek GJ, Glickman LT (1993), Pet ownership protects 
against the risks and consequences of coronary heart 
disease. Med Hypotheses 40(4):245-249.
Pet theories. Psychology Today Aug. 1984, pp 60-67.
Poresky RH, Hendrix C (1990), Differential effects of pet 
presence and pet-bonding on young children. Psychol Rep 
67(1):51-54.
Robin M, ten Bensel R (1990), Pets and the socialization of 
children. Lathum Letter 11(2):1-23.
Schneidhacker M (1994), Die arbeit mit dem pferd in 
psychiatrie and psychotherapie (Working with the horse in 
psychiatry and psychotherapy) Warendorf, Germany: Schnell, 
Buch & Druck.
Searles H (1960), The Nonhuman Environment in Normal 
Development and in Schizophrenia. New York: International 
Universities Press.
Serpell J (1991), Beneficial effects of pet ownership on 
some aspects of human health and behavior. J R Soc Med 
84(12):717-720.
Siegel JM (1990), Stressful life events and use of physician 
services among the elderly: the moderating role of pet 
ownership. J Pers Soc Psychol 58(6):1081-1086.
Van Houtte BA, Jarvis PA (1995), The role of pets in 
preadolescent psychosocial development. J Appl Dev Psychol 
16:463-479.
Voelker R (1995), Puppy love can be therapeutic, too. JAMA, 
274(24):1897-1899. Published erratum: JAMA 275(13):988.
Voith VL (1985), Attachment of people to companion animals. 
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 15(2):289-295.
Wells M (1998), Dog presence effects on children's stress 
responses during medical procedures. Presented at the Delta 
Society 17th Annual Conference. Seattle.

Другие статьи

Анималотерапия

На главную


Hosted by uCoz